Effects of Dual-Task Versus Single-Task Gait Training on Walking Performance After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59141/-.v8i2.560Keywords:
Stroke, Dual-Task Training, Gait Rehabilitation, Walking Performance, Meta-AnalysisAbstract
Stroke frequently causes persistent gait impairments that limit independence and safe participation in community activities, particularly when walking requires the simultaneous performance of cognitive or motor tasks. This study aimed to compare the effects of dual-task gait training and single-task gait training on walking performance in adults after stroke. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect were searched for randomized controlled trials involving adults with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Four studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, while three studies involving 87 participants provided comparable absolute gait-speed data for quantitative analysis. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a fixed-effect model, and statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. The pooled analysis showed no statistically significant difference in postintervention gait speed between dual-task and single-task gait training (mean difference = 0.05; 95% CI: −0.08 to 0.18; I² = 0%). Nevertheless, the qualitative findings indicated that dual-task gait training was feasible and may provide context-specific benefits for walking capacity, gait adaptability, and performance under divided-attention conditions. In conclusion, dual-task gait training was not superior to single-task gait training for improving absolute gait speed after stroke, although its functional benefits may be better captured by outcome measures that reflect complex, real-world walking demands and everyday mobility.
Downloads
References
Aderinto, N., Abraham, I. C., Olatunji, G., Kokori, E., Yusuf, I. A., Adejumo, F. A., Olatunbosun, J. O., Bukky, S. O., Akintepede, F. O., & Olawade, D. B. (2025). Efficacy and safety of dual-task training in enhancing cognitive and motor recovery for post-stroke rehabilitation. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 88(1), 569.
Al-Yahya, E., Dawes, H., Smith, L., Dennis, A., Howells, K., & Cockburn, J. (2011). Cognitive motor interference while walking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 715–728.
Bartloff, J., Lanotte, F., O’Brien, M. K., & Jayaraman, A. (2025). Advancing gait rehabilitation through wearable technologies: Current landscape and future directions. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 22(10), 1105–1116.
Brown, D. A., LaCroix, K. L., Alhirsan, S. M., Capo-Lugo, C. E., Hennessy, R. W., & Hurt, C. P. (2022). Designing user-centered technologies for rehabilitation challenge that optimize walking and balance performance. In Neurorehabilitation technology (pp. 191–205). Springer.
Chow, V. W. K., Ellmers, T. J., Young, W. R., Mak, T. C. T., & Wong, T. W. L. (2018). Revisiting the relationship between internal focus and balance control in young and older adults. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, 1131.
GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. (2021). Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet Neurology, 20(10), 795–820.
Khan, M., Almutairi, M. A., Aldhafeeri, H. M., Sharahily, M. A., & Amri, M. I. (n.d.). Comparison of dual-task specific training & conventional physiotherapeutic interventions in ambulation of left hemiplegic stroke patients: A randomized control trial. 6(1).
Kwon, J. W. (2026). The uneven landscape of cognitive–motor dual-task research across rehabilitation fields: A state-of-the-field and pattern analysis. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation, 100597.
Lang, C. E., Holleran, C. L., Strube, M. J., Ellis, T. D., Newman, C. A., Fahey, M., DeAngelis, T. R., Nordahl, T. J., Reisman, D. S., & Earhart, G. M. (2022). Improvement in the capacity for activity versus improvement in performance of activity in daily life during outpatient rehabilitation. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 47(1), 16.
Langhorne, P., Bernhardt, J., & Kwakkel, G. (2011). Stroke rehabilitation. The Lancet, 377(9778), 1693–1702.
Lord, S. E., McPherson, K., McNaughton, H. K., Rochester, L., & Weatherall, M. (2004). Community ambulation after stroke: How important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85(2), 234–239.
Meester, D., Al-Yahya, E., Dennis, A., Collett, J., Wade, D. T., Ovington, M., et al. (2019). A randomized controlled trial of a walking training with simultaneous cognitive demand (dual-task) in chronic stroke. European Journal of Neurology, 26(3), 435–441.
Moore, S. A., Boyne, P., Fulk, G., Verheyden, G., & Fini, N. A. (2022). Walk the talk: Current evidence for walking recovery after stroke, future pathways and a mission for research and clinical practice. Stroke, 53(11), 3494–3505.
Nayak, A., Bhave, A. C., Misri, Z., Unnikrishnan, B., Mahmood, A., Joshua, A. M., & Karthikbabu, S. (2023). Facilitators and barriers of community reintegration among individuals with stroke: A scoping review. European Journal of Physiotherapy, 25(5), 291–304.
Plummer, P., Eskes, G. (2015). Measuring treatment effects on dual-task performance: A framework for research and clinical practice. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 225.
Plummer, P., Villalobos, R. M., Vayda, M. S., Moser, M., & Johnson, E. (2014). Feasibility of dual-task gait training for community-dwelling adults after stroke: A case series. Stroke Research and Treatment, 2014, 538602.
Plummer, P., Zukowski, L. A., Feld, J. A., & Najafi, B. (2022). Cognitive-motor dual-task gait training within 3 years after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 38(10), 1329–1344.
Tasseel-Ponche, S., Delafontaine, A., Godefroy, O., Yelnik, A. P., Doutrellot, P. L., Duchossoy, C., et al. (2022). Walking speed at the acute and subacute stroke stage: A descriptive meta-analysis. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, 989622.
Wade, D. T. (2024). A general theory of rehabilitation: Rehabilitation catalyses and assists adaptation to illness. Clinical Rehabilitation, 38(4), 429–442.
Zainol Abidin, N., Mansor, N. S., Ahmad Yusof, H., Abd Hamid, A. I., & Mat Isa, S. (2026). The impact of dual-task training versus single-task training on cognitive and physical function in neurologically impaired individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 00315125261425126.
Zhang, X., Xu, F., Shi, H., Liu, R., & Wan, X. (2022). Effects of dual-task training on gait and balance in stroke patients: A meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 36, 1186–1198.
Zhao, Y., Guo, C., Zhang, D., Wei, X., Jiang, X., & Bi, H. (2026). Effects of dual-task training on walking and balance in stroke patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 40(4), 433–450.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tsalis Yuna Hafshoh, Nadia Afnani Er Rahmah, Yunita Dwie Rani Fortuna, Zhaki Al Asror, Ahmad Zayyin Najah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.





