Topical Fluorometholone versus Dexamethasone for Postoperative Inflammation Control following Phacoemulsification : A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59141/-.v8i2.548Keywords:
Fluorometholone, Dexamethasone, Phacoemulsification, postoperative inflammation, Cystoid Macular Edema, Intraocular PressureAbstract
Control of postoperative inflammation is a critical component of clinical management following phacoemulsification surgery, and topical corticosteroids remain the standard of care for this purpose; however, the comparative efficacy and safety profiles of fluorometholone (FML) versus dexamethasone (DEX) remain incompletely characterized due to the limited number of direct head-to-head clinical trials available in the literature. This systematic review screened studies comparing topical FML 0.1% against DEX 0.1% for the management of postoperative inflammation following phacoemulsification in adult patients without pre-existing ocular inflammatory conditions, with outcomes assessed including anterior chamber cell and flare grading, intraocular pressure (IOP) changes, incidence of cystoid macular edema (CME), and visual acuity, with data systematically extracted from both randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Direct comparative data between the two agents were limited; two independent network meta-analyses consistently ranked DEX as superior to FML for CME prevention, with DEX demonstrating the highest SUCRA probability [3,4], while one RCT reported that FML was associated with early IOP elevation, with 4.98% of patients experiencing a rise of ≥10 mmHg, whereas DEX showed no comparable elevation [1]. A separate meta-analysis comparing standard versus soft steroids demonstrated significantly lower anterior chamber flare with standard steroids (including DEX) at day 7 (SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.05–0.47), though this difference did not persist at day 28 [5], and pharmacokinetic analyses revealed that FML achieves peak aqueous humour concentrations approximately 130-fold lower than prednisolone and substantially lower than DEX [6], with one study finding no significant difference in aqueous flare between FML and no steroid treatment at all [7]. These findings indicate that DEX demonstrates superior anti-inflammatory efficacy, particularly in preventing CME, likely attributable to its greater intraocular penetration capacity, whereas FML appears to offer a more favourable IOP safety profile across most available studies, although one contradictory trial reported higher IOP spikes associated with FML use, carrying the clinical implication that DEX is more effective for managing intraocular inflammation while FML may be adequate for mild ocular surface inflammation or as a step-down maintenance agent following initial DEX therapy. In conclusion, dexamethasone 0.1% demonstrates greater efficacy than fluorometholone 0.1% in controlling postoperative intraocular inflammation and preventing CME after phacoemulsification, albeit with a potentially elevated IOP risk in susceptible patients, and based on current evidence, fluorometholone should not be employed as first-line monotherapy for intraocular inflammation control following cataract surgery.
Downloads
References
Abhilash, S. S., Somayaji, S., Gore, S. R., et al. (2023). Impact of prednisolone, dexamethasone, and fluorometholone eye drops on intraocular pressure in patients post-cataract surgery: A randomized controlled study. Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijceo.2023.098
Aaronson, A., Taipale, C., Achiron, A., et al. (2021). Relationship between prolonged intraocular inflammation and macular edema after cataract surgery. Translational Vision Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.7.15
Haddad, J., Sabbakh, N. A., Macaron, M. M., et al. (2023). NSAIDs and corticosteroids for the postoperative management of age-related cataract surgery. American Journal of Ophthalmology—Glaucoma. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2023.09.027
Hingorani, S., Desai, A. S., & Shastri, M. B. (2021). An observational comparative study of intraocular pressure changes in post-operative cataract patients treated with dexamethasone, difluprednate and prednisolone in a tertiary care centre. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20213753
Kessel, L., Tendal, B., Jørgensen, K., et al. (2015). Author reply: To PMID 24935281. Ophthalmology, 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.11.028
Kim, S. J. (2015). Re: Kessel et al.: Post-cataract prevention of inflammation and macular edema by steroid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory eye drops (Ophthalmology 2014;121:1915–24). Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.12.009
Lee, J. H., Chung, H., Moon, S., et al. (2021). Effect of preoperative eyedrops on cytokine concentrations in aqueous humor of patients undergoing femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05428-1
Levitz, L. M., Lim, C., Grzybowski, A., & Kim, S. J. (2021). Comment on: Comparative study of topical steroids vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to control postcataract surgery inflammation. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000572
Li, S., Wang, H., Zhang, D. (2021). Comparison of the efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroid drugs for prevention of cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-954313/v1
Li, S., Wang, H., Wang, Y., et al. (2022). Comparison of the efficacy and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroid drugs for prevention of cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery. International Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02426-y
Matsumura, T., Iwasaki, K., Arimura, S., et al. (2021). Topical bromfenac reduces multiple inflammatory cytokines in the aqueous humour of pseudophakic patients. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85495-w
Mohankumar, K., Lune, A. A., Goud, R., et al. (2021). Study of prevalence of raised IOP in post cataract patients following topical steroid usage. Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijceo.2021.087
Nanji, K., Staibano, P., McKechnie, T., et al. (2024). Cystoid macular edema prophylaxis in cataract surgery. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314467
Noyman, D. B. E., Chan, C. C., Mimouni, M., & Safir, M. (2023). The efficacy and safety of standard versus soft topical steroids after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.11.022
Prasad, D. (2021). A clinical study on changes in IOP after dexamethasone usage following manual small incision cataract surgery. Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research. https://doi.org/10.18535/JMSCR/V9I1.38
Pleyer, U., Ursell, P., & Rama, P. (2013). Intraocular pressure effects of common topical steroids for post-cataract inflammation: Are they all the same? Ophthalmology and Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-013-0020-5
Simons, R., Wielders, L. H., Dirksen, C., et al. (2020). Economic evaluation of prevention of cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery in nondiabetic patients: ESCRS PREMED study report 4. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000449
Torres, A. dos R., Matrone, I. de A., Zandavali, J. M., et al. (2025). Análise da eficácia de colírios anti-inflamatórios pós-cirurgia de catarata: Revisão sistemática de ensaios clínicos. Revista FT. https://doi.org/10.69849/revistaft/ar10202510081026
Wang, Q., Yao, K., Xu, W., et al. (2013). Bromfenac sodium 0.1%, fluorometholone 0.1% and dexamethasone 0.1% for control of ocular inflammation and prevention of cystoid macular edema after phacoemulsification. Ophthalmologica. https://doi.org/10.1159/000346847
Way, C., Swampillai, A., Lim, K. S., & Nanavaty, M. (2023). Factors influencing aqueous flare after cataract surgery and its evaluation with laser flare photometry. Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414231204111
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Melisa Maharani, Euis Eva Masruroh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.





