Perbandingan Uji Diagnostik Kuesioner Sindrom Terowongan Karpal Boston dengan Kuesioner Kamath dan Stothard Pada Pasien Sindrom Terowongan Karpal di Rumah Sakit Adam Malik Medan

Authors

  • Melysa Kemala Putri Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • Aida Fithrie Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
  • R.A. Dwi Pujiastuti Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

Keywords:

Kuesioner Sindrom Terowongan Karpal Boston, Kuesioner Kamath dan Stothard, Pemeriksaan Konduksi Saraf, Sindrom Terowongan Karpal

Abstract

Latar Belakang: Diagnosis Sindrom Terowongan Karpal (STK) yang akurat sangat penting untuk terapi yang tepat sehingga dapat meningkatkan kualitas hidup pasien. Namun, tidak semua fasilitas kesehatan memiliki alat pemeriksaan konduksi saraf serta biaya pemeriksaan yang tidak sedikit sehingga banyak kasus tidak dapat terdiagnosis dengan baik. Dengan adanya keterbatasan tersebut maka dikembangkan kuesioner atau instrumen yang dapat membantu klinisi untuk mendiagnosis STK. Tujuan: Mengetahui nilai uji diagnostik Kuesioner Sindrom Terowongan Karpal Boston (KSTK-B) dengan Kuesioner Kamath dan Stothard (KKS) di RS Adam Malik Medan. Metode Penelitian: Penelitian ini menggunakan desain analitik observasional pada 51 pasien (67 manus yang diperiksa) yang mengalami gejala klinis STK di RS Adam Malik Medan yang memenuhi kriteria penelitian serta dikonfirmasi dengan pemeriksaan konduksi saraf. Kemudian dilakukan analisis statistik untuk menilai sensitivitas, spesifisitas, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, akurasi, serta nilai AUC dan ROC. Hasil: Terdapat 51 subjek penelitian, dengan mayoritas berjenis kelamin perempuan (66,7%). Hasil uji diagnostik untuk KSTK-B didapatkan sensitivitas sebesar 83,6%, spesifisitas sebesar 66,7%, PPV sebesar 92,0%, NPV sebesar 47,0%, LR+ sebesar 2,5, LR- sebesar 0,25, akurasi sebesar 80,5%, AUC sebesar 0,752. Sedangkan pada KKS didapatkan sensitivitas sebesar 87,2%, spesifisitas sebesar 75,0%, PPV sebesar 94,1%, NPV sebesar 56,2%, LR+ sebesar 3,49, LR- sebesar 0,17, akurasi sebesar 85,1%, dan nilai AUC sebesar 0,811. Kesimpulan: Pada hasil penelitian ini, KKS memiliki sensitifitas, spesifisitas, PPV, NPV, LR+, LR-, Akurasi, Nilai AUC, dan ROC yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan KSTK-B dalam mendiagnosis Sindrom Terowongan Karpal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aboong, M. S. (2015). Pathophysiology of carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurosciences, 20(1), 4-7.

Akbar, J., Fatimah, N., & Lasim, B. I. (2021). Perbandingan pemeriksaan antara kuesioner BCTQ dengan ENMG terhadap kecepatan hantar saraf pasien carpal tunnel syndrome. Sriwijaya Journal of Medicine, 4(2), 161-170.

Alahmad, M., Al-Khafaji, F., Alahmad, M. A. M., & Al-Taie, A. (2021). Comprehensive assessment of ultrasound's role in carpal tunnel syndrome in reference to electromyography. Cureus, 13(12), e20798. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20798

British Society for Surgery of the Hand. (2011). BSSH evidence for surgical treatment (BEST): Carpal tunnel syndrome. http://www.hands2elbowsurgeon.co.uk/uploads/1/5/6/1/15615196/carpal_tunnel_syndrome.pdf

Dabbagh, A., MacDermid, J. C., Packham, T. L., & Macedo, L. G. (2020). Content validation of the Kamath and Stothard questionnaire for carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosis: A cognitive interviewing study. Journal of Hand Therapy, 33(3), 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2020.03.006

Dahlan, S. (2014). Statistik untuk kedokteran dan kesehatan (6th ed.). Salemba Medika.

Dinescu, V. C., Poenaru, M., Baican, A., Tutunaru, D., & Rosca, E. C. (2025). Limitations of the Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire in assessing severity in a homogeneous occupational cohort. Life, 15(1), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/life15010132

Draghici, N. C., Leucuta, D. C., Ciobanu, D. M., Stan, A. D., Lupescu, T. D., & Muresanu, D. F. (2023). Clinical utility of Boston-CTS and six-item CTS questionnaires in carpal tunnel syndrome associated with diabetic polyneuropathy. Diagnostics, 13(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010004

Edwards, C. (2020). Exploring the potential of a questionnaire in predicting results of nerve conduction studies in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome: Exploring a clinician and patient complete version. Open Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 8(3), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojtr.2020.83010

Erickson, M., Lawrence, M., Jansen, C. W. S., Coker, D., Amadio, P., & Cleary, C. (2019). Hand pain and sensory deficits: Carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical practice guidelines linked to the international classification of functioning, disability and health from the academy of hand and upper extremity physical therapy and the academy of orthopaedic physical therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 49(5), CPG1-CPG85. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2019.0301

Ferraguti, M. S., Morano, G., Restrepo, F. P., & Melo, L. M. (2024). Effectiveness of the six-item carpal tunnel symptoms scale (CTS-6) questionnaire for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, 32(3), e267890. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220243203e267890

Fitri, F. I., Fithrie, A., Rambe, A. S., & Sjahrir, H. (2015). Pengaruh metilkobalamin pada sindrom terowongan karpal dengan dan tanpa diabetes melitus. Neurona, 33(1), 52-58.

Fowler, J. R. (2017). Nerve conduction studies for carpal tunnel syndrome: Gold standard or unnecessary evil? Orthopedics, 40(3), 141-142. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20170327-01

Genova, A., Dix, O., Saefan, A., Thakur, M., & Hassan, A. (2020). Carpal tunnel syndrome: A review of literature. Cureus, 12(3), e7333. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7333

Hamid, A., Rahman, Z. F., Widati, S., Suherdin, & Ardyanto, W. D. (2020). Factors related to carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) complaints employees in the Bank BNI Branch of Palu. The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 11(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.20473/ijosh.v11i1.2022.63-74

Joshi, A., Agarwal, A., Mangla, D., Satsangi, A., Patel, K., Tanwar, H., Dang, R., & Kalaiselvan, M. S. (2022). Carpal tunnel syndrome: Pathophysiology and comprehensive guidelines for clinical evaluation and treatment. Cureus, 14(7), e27053. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27053

Kamilah, R. H., Fatimah, N., & Zulissetiana, E. F. (2018). Korelasi kecepatan hantaran saraf tepi nervus medianus dengan derajat keparahan carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) menggunakan global symptom score (GSS). Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan, 5(2), 72-77.

Nasution, N., Benny, & Fitriadi, D. (2024). Case series: Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire clinical function assessment outcomes of carpal tunnel injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. International Surgery Journal, 11(5), 755-760. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20241134

Octaviana, F., Pramudita, A. E., Safri, A. Y., & Djoenaidi, W. (2022). Uji validitas dan reliabilitas kuesioner sindrom terowongan karpal Boston versi bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Neurologi Indonesia, 10(1), 18-25.

Purwaningsari, D., & Riami. (2023). Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS): Literatur review. Jurnal Medika Hutama, 4(2), 425-430.

Putra, M. R. (2021). Korelasi antara indeks massa tubuh, kadar vitamin D dan kadar high sensitivity C-reactive protein dengan keparahan carpal tunnel syndrome [Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan]. Universitas Sumatera Utara.

Royal College of Surgeons of England. (2017). Commissioning guide: Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/-/media/files/rcs/standards-and-research/commissioning/boa-carpal-tunnel-syndrome-guide.pdf

Sangram, B. S., Mayne, A. I. W., & Jariwala, A. C. (2019). Can we accurately predict nerve conduction study outcome using a carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire? The Surgeon, 17(3), 156-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2018.05.004

Sirisena, D., Lim, I., Sim, S., Tong, P. Y., & Rajaratnam, V. (2022). Can the Boston carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire be used as a screening tool among a potentially high-risk population in Singapore? Journal of Hand Microsurgery, 14(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1729763

Sonoo, M., Menkes, L. D., Bland, D. P. J., & Burke, D. (2018). Nerve conduction studies and EMG in carpal tunnel syndrome: Do they add value? Clinical Neurophysiology Practice, 3, 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2018.02.005

Toth, F., Kiss, E., Marafko, C., Nemes, J., & Hegedus, Z. (2021). The clinical value of the self-administered Kamath and Stothard's questionnaire in the diagnostics of carpal tunnel syndrome. Diagnostics, 11(2), 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020359

Wang, W. L., Buterbaugh, K., Kadow, T. R., Goitz, R. J., & Fowler, J. R. (2018). A prospective comparison of diagnostic tools for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 43(9), 833-836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.06.021

Wipperman, J., & Goerl, K. (2016). Carpal tunnel syndrome: Diagnosis and management. American Family Physician, 94(12), 993-999.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-17

How to Cite

Putri, M. K., Fithrie, A. ., & Pujiastuti, R. D. . (2025). Perbandingan Uji Diagnostik Kuesioner Sindrom Terowongan Karpal Boston dengan Kuesioner Kamath dan Stothard Pada Pasien Sindrom Terowongan Karpal di Rumah Sakit Adam Malik Medan. Jurnal Sehat Indonesia (JUSINDO), 7(2), 1389–1402. Retrieved from https://jusindo.publikasiindonesia.id/index.php/jsi/article/view/424